A Second Question for my “Traditionalist” friends…what about polygamy?

For my non-United Methodist readers, please bear with me for one more post about our current debate within the UMC.  Last week I raised the question about the training of clergy under the “Traditionalist” proposals for the future of the denomination.  One correction:  I assumed the restrictions and penalties included in the legislation applied to institutions as well as bishops and annual conferences.  That is not the case at this time.  However, it is not hard to imagine those same requirements ultimately making it into the review of schools by the University Senate and the purge would be on.  Short of that, I still believe many of our institutions would not be comfortable being identified with a denomination which moved in such a punitive direction, so my essential question still remains–where will you train your clergy?  The only answer I received was that this is a “follow-on question” to be discussed after the General Conference, which I take to mean no one has really thought about it yet.

Now here is a second question for my “traditionalist” friends:  What about polygamy? 

The argument against same sex marriage is based on the belief that the Biblical standard for marriage is one man/one woman.  The traditionalist position affirms the current language of the Book of Discipline which says “the practice of homosexuality is incompatible with Christian teaching” and the famous seven last words–“celibacy in singleness and fidelity in marriage”. They bolster their position by appealing for sensitivity to the African context where the taboo against homosexuality is widespread and strong.

So based on the same logic, will the traditionalists make the same argument against polygamy which is still widespread in parts of Africa?

From the detailed legislation which has been proposed, it looks like the answer is, “No”.  All the requirements, restrictions and penalties relate to same sex marriage and the ordination of homosexual persons. It appears the  traditionalists are eager to gain the support of the African delegates for their stance against the acceptance of homosexuality, but are blind to the fact that the practice of polygamy is just as “incompatible” with their understanding of Scripture as same sex marriage.

I suppose you could ask the same question about divorce and remarriage, given that in the Sermon on the Mount Jesus said anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery,  but evidently the traditionalists are not prepared to be that traditional. And what about sex before marriage?  Are we going to add a question to the review of candidates for ordination about whether or not they are virgins?  There is nothing in the legislation about these issues at this point, but I suppose…who knows?

Let me be quick to say I am not arguing in favor of polygamy or premarital sex. I am simply asking a question about consistency in one’s ethical standard.  If same sex marriage and the “practice of homosexuality” (to use the words of the Book of Discipline) are incompatible with the Biblical standard of one man/one woman, isn’t polygamy just as incompatible?  And when the supporters of the traditionalist plan want to argue the importance of the global church in these matters, why the silence on one issue when you are so out-spoken on the other?  Or in the end, is this whole debate just about homosexuality…and perhaps getting the African votes at General Conference?


6 thoughts on “A Second Question for my “Traditionalist” friends…what about polygamy?

  1. ryan

    This is a red herring of a posting.

    1. Our current definition already speaks against polygamy.
    2. Wesley defines marriage as between one man and one woman in the explanatory notes on the NT in several places.
    3. No one is arguing to change our discipline to affirm polygamy.

    The question as raised has already been addressed.

      1. ryan

        There is no issue with 3. Which is why asking the question comes across as lacking any integrity at all. You aren’t asking seriously. That much is clear.

  2. Bob

    A disclaimer. My time in Africa was not with the church. It was with the military a number of years ago and was not pleasant, though it made some bad people feel a lot worse. I do know from conversations with numerous African delegates at the 2016 General Conference that they are strongly opposed to polygamy and have taken that counter-cultural stand locally at great personal and family sacrifice. Close friends in Zimbabwe and Liberia are absolute in their rejection of the practice as Christians, including one who was the child of a polygamous union prior to the family’s conversion to Christ. The Discipline does not single out adult, consensual incest for the same reason it makes no mention of polygamy, I.e., no one is actively defying the historic Christian ethical consensus on those practices.

  3. James J Bonsall

    Did not know this was common in Africa all the more reason for the church to get out of the marriage legal game. Shame the church is losing members while this debate occurs.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s